I did not call anybody a racist. I did say that the comments bordered on racism. I neglected to add religious intolerance. It seems that Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and, probably, Sikhs, Jews, Janes, Mormons et al would not be considered as suitable alternatives to a secure compound.
The point I was trying to make was that the use of emotive comments such as:
'What about turning The Guards Chapel into a centeral Mosque for all the governments islamic friends working in centeral London.'
'If they really want a Ghurka Temple in Aldershot why not just build one.'
'knock down the Guards memorial on Horseguards and replace it with a statue of Buddha'
'I am very aware of what our Memorial Hall is being used for at this moment in time, namely Army Kinema Services Library, this organisation very graciously took over the safe keeping of our memorial when they took up tenancy and have looked after it on our behalf.'
Would other tenants not do a good job of the safe keeping of the hall?
I would have no problem in joining your worthy efforts if you had confined your argument to the fact the hall was to be used for purposes other than which it was intended.
You are correct on one point though, I have to admit that I do not know the names of the chefs who died on the Sir Gallahad. Neither do I know the names of all the other brave men and women, irrespective of trade, who have perished, not just in that incident; but all others before and since.
However, I am indeed extremely proud to have served in the Army Catering Corps and I am proud to have served with many extraordinary soldiers.
On that note, I respectfully remain... etc